Ahmadyar v. First Horizon Home Loans, et al
Patricia Ahmadyar and Ahmad Ahmadyar |
First Horizon Home Loans and Quality Loan Service Corporation |
2:2009cv02063 |
July 27, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Garland E. Burrell |
None |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/12/10 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Owen, K) |
Filing 50 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/4/2010 DENYING as MOOT First Horizon Home's 49 Ex Parte Application to Expunge Recorded Lis Pendens. Plaintiffs shall file an explanation, no later than 8/11/2010 at 4:30 PM, why their case should no be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 28 ORDER and RULE 4(M) NOTICE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/13/2009: Status Conference reset for 11/16/2009 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Suttles, J) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 09/03/09 re 24 Stipulation. IT IS ORDERED that 10 Motion to Expunge is deemed WITHDRAWN since the parties should have obtained a hearing date themselves; and 7 Motion to Dismiss is deemed WITHDRAWN since the parties' stipulation makes is unclear whether that motion should continue pending. (Streeter, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.