Gomez-Perez v. McDonald et al
| Octavio Gomez-Perez |
| Mike McDonald and California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation |
| 2:2009cv02093 |
| July 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 01/24/11 RECOMMENDING that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED. Objections due within 21 days.(Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/2/10 DENYING 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/8/10 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. Petitioner's 5 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/04/09 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the IFP form used by this district. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
