Stone vs. Cate, et al.,
| Edith Stone |
| Matthew Cate, Glenda Pressly, Nancy Hanley, Tammie Scheid and California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation |
| 2:2009cv02139 |
| July 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/29/2011 DENYING 38 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Tammie Scheid. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/1/11 ORDERING 34 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted. Judgment shall be entered judgment in favor of defendants.Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/21/11 GRANTING Defendant Judgment on the Pleadings. Defendant Scheid is GRANTED judgment on the pleadings on all Plaintiff's claims. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant if no response is filed within seven (7) days of the date on which this tentative ruling is filed.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 05/10/10 GRANTING with prejudice 14 , 16 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's alleged claims against Glenda Pressly; Matthew Cate and Nancy Hanley are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/3/2010 ORDERING that since all of Plaintiff's claims have been dismissed, the merits of Defendants Cate and Pressly's qualified immunity arguments are not reached. For the stated reasons, De fendants' 7 motion to dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend, except the claims against Defendant CDCR, which are dismissed without leave to amend. Plaintiff is granted ten (10) days from the date on which this Order is filed within which to file a first amended complaint correcting the deficiencies in the claims dismissed. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/23/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff is Ordered to Show Cause ("OSC") in a writing to be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on November 16, 2009 why sanct ions should not be imposed against her and/or her counsel under Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to file a timely status report. The written response shall also state whether Plaintiff or her counsel is at fault, and whe ther a hearing is requested on the OSC. If a hearing is requested, it will be held on December 14, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., just prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that date. A status report shall be filed no later than fourteen days prior to the status conference. (Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
