Torres v. Havilland
| Alberto Torres |
| John Havilland |
| 2:2009cv02150 |
| August 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/21/11 ORDERING that petitioner inform this court within 14 days whether he intends that his putative Rule 60(b) motion be so construed or, instead, should be construed as one pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the FRCP. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/4/2011 ORDERING the clerk to subsitute Vince Cullen, Warden as respondent in the dkt of this case; and ptnr's 25 motion to strike respondent's reply is DENIED; and RECOMMENDING that respondent's 17 motion to dismiss be granted. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due w/in 14 days.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/3/2010 ORDERING ptnr to show cause, w/in 21 days, why respondent's 5/28/10, motion to dismiss should not be granted. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/1/2010 ORDERING that petitioner's 16 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/29/2010 ORDERING the petitioner to SHOW CAUSE, w/in 21 days, why this petition should not be dismissed as mistakenly filed in federal court, and, if properly filed in this court, when his state court remedies in this matter were exhausted.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/22/10 ORDERING that this action is reassigned to Judge Mendez and Magistrate Judge Hollows forall further proceedings; henceforth, the caption on documents filed in this action shall be shown as No. CIV S-09-278 JAM GGH; and Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/1/09 ORDERING that petitioner shall submit, within 30 days, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Torres v. Havilland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Alberto Torres | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: John Havilland | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
