Khanna v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. et al
Shashi Khanna |
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Neil Martau, Lance Mueller, Roland A. Hernandez, Paul R. Miller, Michael P. Macharg, Jeanne Gervin, Michael Sutkaytis, Jana Fanning, Brittany Moore, Catherine Ross, Linda Sayad, Mark Chamberlain and James Latham |
2:2009cv02214 |
August 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Garland E. Burrell |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/3/15: The plaintiffs are awarded reasonable costs of $32,347.02. The plaintiffs are awarded an administration fee of $7,000. Khanna is awarded an incentive fee of $2,500. The benchma rk value for attorneys' fees, $97,500, is reduced by $9,347.02, the excess of the sum of costs, administration fee, incentive fee, and the 25 percent benchmark over $130,000, leaving a fee award of $88,152.98. As promptly a s possible, and no later than sixty days from the date of this order, the Claims Administrator shall disburse the settlement amount due to each class member, the incentive payment to the named plaintiff, and attorneys' fees and costs. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 75 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/8/14 ORDERING the court finds $32,347.02 in costs to be reasonable; The Class Administrator's fee of $7,000 is reasonable. From the $97,500 set aside for fees and costs, the cou rt awards $32,347.02 in costs to class counsel, $7,000 in fees to the Class Administrator, and a $2,500 incentive award to the named plaintiff, for a total of $43,847.02, leaving a fee award of $53,652.98. For the reasons set forth above, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for final approval of the class and collective action settlement is hereby GRANTED; No later than sixty days after the date of this order, the Claims Administrator shall disburse the set tlement amount due to each class member, the incentive payment to the named plaintiff, and attorneys' fees and costs; The named plaintiff is entitled to an incentive payment of $2,500; Class counsel is entitled to fees and costs in the am ount of $95,000; Upon the distribution of the settlement payments, attorneys' fees and costs, and the incentive payment, defendant, the released parties and defendant's counsel shall have no further liability or responsibility to class counsel, plaintiff, or any other class member; and The action is dismissed with prejudice. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 73 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/10/2013 ORDERING The court DIRECTS the parties to provide answers to the questions in response to this order within 21 days of the date of this order. (Reader, L) |
Filing 66 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/2013 ORDERING the schedule of relevant dates and deadlines is APPROVED. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 64 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/21/2013 ORDERING 51 CPT Group is APPOINTED as Claims Administrator to carry out the duties of the administrator as set forth in the stipulation of settlement, ECF No. 52 -1 at 32-33; the stipulation o f settlement is preliminarily approved as fair and reasonable under Rule 23 and the FLSA, subject to final consideration at the fairness hearing; the Proposed Class Notice is APPROVED, ECF No. 59 -1 at 6-13; and The court directs the parties to submit, within 7 days of the date of this order, a new proposed schedule, setting the same day for objections to settlement and fees, after the completed fee motion has been filed. (Reader, L) |
Filing 58 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/24/12 ORDERING that Mastagni, Holstedt, Amick, Miller & Johnsen is appointed as class counsel; Preliminary certification of the class and the collective action is granted; Preliminary approval of th e settlement is denied without prejudice; Approval of the proposed notice is denied without prejudice; and The parties may submit further information about the settlement and a new proposed notice within forty-five days of the date of this order. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 51 STIPULATION and ORDER for Continued Date for Filing Request for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/2/11 ORDERING filing date of 6/3/11 for the Request for Approval and Dismissal continued to June 17, 2011. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 43 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/2/2010 GRANTING 39 Motion to Substitute Priyanka Khanna as plaintiff in place of Shashi Khanna. (Matson, R) |
Filing 31 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 11/10/2009 ORDERING 22 for reasons stated, Inter-Con's motion to strike, or alternatively dismiss, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (Reader, L) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/23/09 ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONTINUED to 1/19/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than fo urteen (14) days prior to theStatus Conference. Further, Plaintiffs are notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that any defendant not served with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule will be dismissed as a defendant in this action unless Plaintiffs provide proof of service and/or "shows good cause for the failure" to serve within this prescribed period in a filing due no later than 4:00 pm on 12/20/2009. (Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.