Shope v. Solano County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff: Trevor Shope
Defendant: Solano County Sheriff Department
Case Number: 2:2009cv02215
Filed: August 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/11/11 ORDERING the clerk of the court is directed to assign a District judge to this case. U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. randomly assigned to thi s case. Also, RECOMMENDING that the 03/11/11 motion for summary judgment 39 be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 39 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
April 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/2011 ORDERING the clerk to change pltf's address of record on the court docket pursuant to Dkt. No. 38, and to re-serve a copy of court orders Dkt Nos. 35 and 37 on pltf's current a ddress; dfts shall re-serve the 3/11/2011 motion for summary judment and supporting documents on pltf's current address, and file a certificate of service w/in 7 days; pltf's opposition to the motion for summary judgment is due 21 days from the date dft re-serves the motion for summary judgment, dft's reply due 7 days thereafter; and pltf's 42 motion is GRANTED; pltf is presently proceeding w/out counsel and in forma pauperis. (Yin, K)
February 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/23/11 ordering defendant's 02/23/11 request 36 is granted. The 02/07/11 pretrial motions deadline is extended to 03/15/11. (Plummer, M) Modified on 2/24/2011 (Plummer, M).
February 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/15/11 ORDERING that defendant notify the court, within 14 days, whether she intends to seek leave of court to file a dispositive motion.(Dillon, M)
December 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/28/10 ordering plaintiff's 12/22/10 motion to retract 33 is partially granted. The 12/03/10 order dismissing the amended complaint 32 is vacated. Plaintiff is relieved of his obligation to file a second amended complaint. This action will proceed on plaintiff's 09/15/09 amended complaint 8 Plaintiff's 12/22/10 motion to appoint counsel 33 is denied. (Plummer, M)
December 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 [VACATED PURSUANT TO 12/29/10 ORDER]ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/02/10 ordering plaintiff's 11/15/10 motion 30 is granted. Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Amendment and sumbit it along with an original and 1 copy of the second amended complaint. (Plummer, M) Modified on 12/29/2010 (Plummer, M).
September 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER denying 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/27/10. (Plummer, M)
June 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/2/10 GRANTING 17 Request for copies. Clerk to serve plaintiff with copies of the 11 Order, 12 Order and the 3/26/10 answer.(Dillon, M)
November 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/17/09 DIRECTING USM to serve amended complaint filed on 09/16/09, on Vee Vee J. (Plummer, M) Modified on 11/18/2009 (Plummer, M).
October 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/07/09 DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms. Service is appropriate for Vee Vee J. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 1 USM-285 Forms, and 1 copy of the Amended Complaint filed on 09/15/09 to be completed and returned within 30 days.(Plummer, M)
August 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Trevor Shope signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/20/09. The Sheriff of Solano County is to collect an initial partial filing fee of $13.20 and thereafter the $33 6.80 balance and fwd to the Clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Sheriff of Solano County. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shope v. Solano County Sheriff Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trevor Shope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Solano County Sheriff Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?