Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians v. State of California, et al
Plaintiff: Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians
Defendant: State of California, California Gambling Control Commission and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Case Number: 2:2009cv02263
Filed: August 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/27/11 ORDERING that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and that each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees incurred herein. CASE CLOSED.(Becknal, R)
November 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/12/10 GRANTING the stipulation to stay all proceedings in this action pending the finality of the Ninth Circuit's decision in Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community v. California, 618 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2010). (Becknal, R)
September 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/29/2010 GRANTING 21 Stipulation and Proposed Order filed by Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians; December 1, 2010 Last day for all discovery to be completed; December 10, 2010 Last day to file dispositive motions; January 12, 2011 9:30 a.m. Hearing on the dispositive motions; February 11, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. Final pre-trial conference; and March 21, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. Trial. (Matson, R)
August 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/5/2010 GRANTING 13 Stipulation and Proposed Order; 9/6/2010 Last day for expert witnesses to be disclosed; September 20, 2010 Last day for supplemental disclosure regarding experts and rebuttal experts; and November 1, 2010 Last day for all discovery to be completed. (Matson, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians v. State of California, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Gambling Control Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians
Represented By: Cheryl Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?