Pollard v. CDC Solano State Prison Medical Facility et al
Kenneth Buford Pollard, III |
CDC Solano State Prison Medical Facility and UC Davis Medical Center |
2:2009cv02277 |
August 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/19/10 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and all outstanding motions are denied. CASE CLOSED(Dillon, M) |
Filing 20 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Kenneth Buford Pollard, III, signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/2/09. The Sheriff of Shasta County is to collect monthly payments and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Sheriff of Shasta County. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Yin, K) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/24/09 ORDERING pltf to submit either the filing fee or the ifp application, w/in 30 days; the clerk to send pltf an ifp application. Failure to comply will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.