Hayee v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Bibi Rakhsana Hayee |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2009cv02285 |
| August 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/12/11 ORDERING plaintiff's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; Commissioner's cross-motion 24 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and the Clerk is directed to enter a judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner. (Matson, R) Modified on 8/15/2011 (Caspar, M).
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/13/10 GRANTING parties stipulated request for extension. Pltf's response to Deft's answer due by 6/9/10. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/21/2010 ORDERING that pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, Pltf shall file her response by 5/10/2010. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/31/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED; The Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases; The Cl erk is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the US Marshal; Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the US Marshal an original and 5 copies of the completed summons, 5 copies of the complaint, 5 copies of th e scheduling order and a completed USM-285 form and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the US Marshal; The US Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days fr om the date of this order. Service of process shall be completed by delivering a copy of the summons, complaint, and scheduling order to the US Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and by sending 2 copies of the summons, complaint, and s cheduling order by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of the US at Washington, D.C., The Marshal shall also send a copy of the summons, Complaint, and scheduling order by registered or certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security, c/o Office of General Counsel, 6401 Security Blvd., Room 611, Altmeyer Blvd., Baltimore, MD, 21235. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hayee v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bibi Rakhsana Hayee | |
| Represented By: | Ann M. Cerney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
