Isom v. Small
Jeffrey Allen Isom |
Larry Small |
2:2009cv02350 |
August 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Imperial |
Gregory G. Hollows |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 9/6/11 recommending that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jeffrey Allen Isom be denied. Objections to F&R due w/in 21 days. (Matson, R) |
Filing 32 ORDER by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Due to the appointment of Recalled Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino to the bench of the Eastern District, this action is REASSIGNED from Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows to Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino for all further proceedings. The District Judge currently assigned to the case will remain unchanged. (Donati, J) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/3/2010 ORDERING that the 14 findings and recommendations filed February 1, 2010, are adopted in full. Petitioner's 3 motion to stay, filed on August 24, 2009 is to be granted only if petitio ner files, within 28 days, an amended petition containing only fully exhausted claims, that is, absent claim 2 of the original petition. Should petitioner not elect to file an exhausted-claims-only petition and to further pursue a stay, this matter will proceed on the original petition with the unexhausted claim 2 stricken from the petition.(Duong, D) |
Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/29/10 recommending that the motion to stay filed on 08/24/09 3 be granted but only upon petitioner's filing within 28 days of adoption of these findings and recom mendations, of an amended petition containing only fully exhausted claims, that is, absent claim 2 of the original petition. It is further recommended that should petitioner not elect to file an exhausted claims only petition and to further pursue a stay that this matter proceed on the original petition, with the unexhausted claim 2 stricken from the petition. MOTION to STAY 3 randomly assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/15/09 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the petition and the motion to stay upon respondent; and respondent is directed to review the petition and the pending motion to stay and to file a response to the motion to stay, filed on August 24, 2009 3 within 15 days.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Isom v. Small | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jeffrey Allen Isom | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Larry Small | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.