Altmann v. Indymac Federal Bank, et al
| Ernest Altmann |
| Indymac Federal Bank, Green Tree Servicing, LLC, Quality Loan Service Corp., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Remien Mortgage Family, Inc., Robert Remien, Pacificbanc Mortgage and National City Mortgage |
| 2:2009cv02361 |
| August 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Plaintiff |
| No cause code entered |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 6/4/10. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER re: 45 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 5/18/10. Dft Indymac Fed Bank is DISMISSED from this action. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/7/2010 ORDERING 17 , 22 Green Tree and MERS's motions to dismiss are GRANTED and Plaintiff's FAC is DISMISSED. Plaintiff, however, is GRANTED leave to amend the dismissed claims provided that an amended complaint is filed within 14 days of the date on which this order is filed. Further, MERS's 18 motion to expunge is DENIED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/3/10 DENYING Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Extension and VACATING the 2/22/10 hearing. Defendants Remien Mortgage Family, Inc. and Robert Remien are dismissed from this action without prejudice. Parties terminated. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/8/2009 ORDERING that the status (pretrial scheduling) conference is CONTINUED to 2/1/2010 at 9:00 AM and FRCP 4(m) notice. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/27/09 ORDERING that on 9/21/09, Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Green Tree Servicing, LLC each filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint. 8 , 10 On 10/23/0 9, however, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, which is now the operative pleading. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner and Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating an amended complaint supercedes the prior complaint). Since the pending motions do not address the operative pleading, they are Denied as Moot. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
