Stone, et al v. Indymac FSB, et al
| John Stone and Dianne Stone |
| Indymac FSB, MTC Financial, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Absolute Loan Inc., Kevin D. McGill and Steve Petee |
| 2:2009cv02394 |
| August 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Plaintiff |
| No cause code entered |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/14/10 ORDERING that dfts' 61 Objections are SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART; Attorney Ms. Lapin is to file an Amended 60 Declaration w/i 10 days clarifying that she will refrain from filing actions against the FDIC as Receiver for IndyMac, and IndyMac. In light of above and the resolution of any outstanding issues at the 09/30/10 hearing, this case is DISMISSED nunc pro tunc. Clerk to close the case. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 05/06/10 ORDERING that the 48 Motion to Substitute Party and for Stay is GRANTED; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Indymac Federal Bank is SUBSTITUTED in for named dfts Indymac FSB and Indymac Federal Bank; all proceedings in this matter are STAYED for 90 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/15/2010 ORDERING 25 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, without leave to amend. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/11/2010 GRANTING 39 Request; Cynthia M. Jara be allowed to appear telephonically at the hearing on Deutsche Bank's Motion to Dismiss, which is set for January 14, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 7 of the above-entitled court, located at 501 I Street, Sacramento, California. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/4/2010 re 36 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' Counsel may appear telephonically at the Motion to Dismiss currently set to be heard on January 14, 2010 in Courtroom 7, before the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. of the above entitled Court, by and through their counsel, Sharon L. Lapin 415-258-1651.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/10/09 ORDERING the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED with leave to amend. 15 21 Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint not later than twenty (20) days after the date this Memorandum and Order is filed electronically. If no amended complaint is filed within said twenty (20)-day period, without further notice, Plaintiffs' claims will be dismissed without leave to amend. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
30
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/18/09: Designation of Expert Witnesses DUE by 10/5/2011. Discovery is DUE by 8/5/2011. Dispositive Motions DUE by 12/5/2011. Final Pretrial Conf is SET for 5/10/2012 at 02:0 0 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Joint Final Pretrial Conf Statement DUE by 4/19/2012. Trial breifs DUE by 4/26/2012 by 4:00 p.m. Any evidentiary or procedural motions DUE by 4/19/2012, Opposition due by 4/26/2012, and any reply due by 5/3/2012. Jury Trial is SET for 7/9/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. The trial is estimated to last five days. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
