Lukas et al v. United Behavioral Health et al
| Jennifer Lukas and Joyce Watters |
| United Behavioral Health and IBM Medical and Dental Employee Welfare Benefit Plans |
| 2:2009cv02423 |
| August 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| William B. Shubb |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/9/13 ORDERING that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs and Prejudgment Interest is continued by 14 days from 4/15/2013 to 4/29/2013. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/15/13 ORDERING that plaintiffs be awarded benefits for Lukas' stay in Alta Mira at 50 percent of the usual and prevailing rate for 45 days for a total of $12,825.00. Plaintiffs shall foll ow the procedures set forth in Local Rule 293 for recovering their attorney fees. Any request for prejudgment interest on the award of benefits is to be determined on plaintiffs' application for attorney fees. (Meuleman, A) Modified on 3/18/2013 (Meuleman, A).
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER RE: COSTS signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/25/2011 ORDERING that costs of $727.20 will be allowed. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM of DECISION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/14/2011. Plaintiffs are to take nothing on their claims and Judgment is entered in favor of defendants. This action is TERMINATED. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
41
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/25/11: Trial RESET for 3/10/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/22/10 ORDERING that the documents comprising the trial exhibits (including the Administrative Record) submitted to the Court with Motion to Seal Documents, shall be filed under SEAL. The Court DECLINES the Request to to seal the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of the Motion to Seal Documents. The court also declines to order all trial briefing in this matter to be filed under seal, subject to reconsideration after the court has an oppo rtunity to review the matters set forth in the briefing. The parties should be apprised that it is not the court's intention to take the highly unusual step of sealing its findings of fact, conclusions of law, or order setting forth the reasons for its final judgment in this matter.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
