Hayes v. D.K. Sisto
Clarence Joseph Hayes |
D.K. Sisto |
2:2009cv02433 |
August 31, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Garland E. Burrell |
Edmund F. Brennan |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 08/08/11 denying as moot 35 Motion for Certificate of Appealability in light of Judge Shubb's 03/11/11 issuance of a certificate. Although plaintiff's notice of appeal appears to be untimely, the clerk of the court is directed to forward the notice to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 31 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 02/09/11 recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. MOTION to DISMISS 28 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 5/27/2010 ORDERING that petitioner's 21 and 23 motions are GRANTED and shall be filed as supplements to his 8/31/09 petition. All further requests to supplement the petition in this manner will be denied. (Yin, K) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 5/6/2010 ORDERING that petitioner's 22 traverse is STRICKEN; petitoner to file a traverse w/in 30 days of respondent's answer. (Yin, K) |
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 03/29/10 ordering respondent is directed to file an answer within 45 days from the date of this order. Petitioner's traverse, if any is due on or before 30 days from the date respondents' answer is filed. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 16 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/19/2010 ORDERING that the action denominated Civ. No. 2:09-2433 GEB EFB shall be reassigned to the Honorable William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds for all further proceedings; the caption shall be Civ. No. 2:09-2433 WBS JFM; the Clerk is directed to make the appropriate adjustment for this reassignment. (Suttles, J) |
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/14/09 ORDERING that petitioner's 3 , 4 motion to proceed ifp is GRANTED; respondent to file a response to the petition w/in 60 days; reply due w/in 30 days of answer; if response is a m otion, opposition or statement of non-opposition due w/in 30 days of motion, reply due w/in 14 days thereafter; the clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the 8/31/09 petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (Michael Farrell)(Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hayes v. D.K. Sisto | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Clarence Joseph Hayes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: D.K. Sisto | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.