Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security
Desiree Hicks |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2009cv02435 |
August 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/6/11; The plaintiff shall be awarded $5,950.00 in attorney fees. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees is rendered moot by this order.(Matson, R) |
Filing 28 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/3/2011 ORDERING that the final decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and this action is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative action pur suant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), sentence four, in accordance with the terms of the parties stipulation. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Commissioner. Plaintiff's 19 motion for summary judgment is moot. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION and ORDER 25 for third extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/13/2010. Defendant has until 1/12/2011 to respond to plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Court does not anticipate granting fourth extension of time for this purpose. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/10/10 ORDERING that Defendant shall have a second extension of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The new date will be 12/13/2010. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/10/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 8/6/10 Stipulation 17 is APPROVED. Plaintiff's time to file a Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 9/10/2010. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/2/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security case s. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within fifteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons, four copies of the co mplaint, and a copy of the scheduling order. Thereafter, plaintiff shall file a statement with the court advising the date upon which said documents were submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. (Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Desiree Hicks | |
Represented By: | Bess M. Brewer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.