Ross v. Sisto et al
| Timothy Ellis Ross |
| D.K. Sisto and John Haviland |
| 2:2009cv02444 |
| August 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/04/11 ordering the parties have 21 days to provide simultaneous supplemental briefing, in light of the very recent decision noted above, demonstrating with the first amended petition should not be dismissed. The court will not look with favor upon requests for extensions of time. All other filing dates are hereby vacated. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER adopting in full 18 findings and recommendations, signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/30/10. Respondent's motion to dismiss 12 is DENIED. The proceedings are STAYED pending exhaustion of state remedies. Petitioner is dire cted to file a status report of his progress in the state courts within 30 days, and then every 30 days thereafter until exhaustion is complete. Within 30 days after the final order of the CA Supreme Court, petitioner must file an amended petition in this court including his fully exhausted claims. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
18
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/22/10 recommending that 12 MOTION to DISMISS be denied; Petitioner be granted a stay; proceedings be stayed pending exhaustion of state remedies; petitioner be directed to file a status report of his progress in the state courts within 30 days, and then every 30 days thereafter until exhaustion is complete; Within 30 days after the final order of the California Supreme Court, petitioner must file an amended petitio n in this court including his fully exhausted claims; and Petitioners failure to comply with these directives will result in the district courts vacating the stay. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/8/09 ORDERING that petitioner's 13 request for appointment of counsel is DENIED w/out prejudice; petitioner's 13 request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and petitioner has 30 days to file a response to respondent's 11/13/09 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
