Benyamini v. Forshythe et al
| Robert P. Benyamini |
| Forshythe, S Leese, R. Fenninokon, R Ramirez, Dysekevice, O'Brian, - Hurtado, McNally and Thompson, - |
| 2:2009cv02453 |
| September 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/19/11 ordering that plaintiff's motions 36 , 37 are denied. The court will not respond to future filings by petitioner that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/20/11 ORDERING that Clerk is directed to randomly assign a US District Judge to this case; US District Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. randomly assigned; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/15/11 DENYING 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/24/2011 ORDERING that the equal protection claim and claims against dfts Thumser, Peterson and Arnold are dismissed w/ leave to amend w/in 30 days, pltf is not obligated to amend his cmplt; alle gations are sufficient to state cognizable claims against dfts T. Forsythe, M. Forsythe, Leese, Fenninokon, Dysekevice, Ramirez, Hurtado and OBrian; the clerk to send pltf forms for service to be completed and return w/in 30 days, if pltf chooses, the Notice of Amendment or Submission to be returned w/ any reply.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/30/10 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate docket numbers 13 , 14 , 15 and 16 . Clerk of the Court is directed to re-serve on plaintiff the courts 7 order, along with one summons, seven USM-285 forms, an instruction sheet and a copy of the 9/1/09 complaint. Plaintiff has 30 days to comply with the 7 order. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/12/10 ordering plaintiff's request for assistance with bail 10 is denied. Plaintiff's 03/17/10 request for appointment of counsel and/or a stay 11 is denied. Plaintiff has 21 days from the date of this order either to explain his failure to comply with the 02/25/10 order, or to comply with the order, by submitting 1 completed summon, 7 USM-285 forms and 8 copies of the 09/01/09 complaint.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Robert P. Benyamini signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/25/10. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/10/09 ORDERING that pltf has 30 days to submit either the filing fee or the required 1915(a) application; the clerk to mail pltf an ifp application form.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
