Lanin v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. et al
| Dmitriy Lanin |
| Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Marin Conveyancing Corporation, Capital One, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2009cv02461 |
| September 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| None |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr on 5/21/10 REMANDING CASE to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Placer. Copy of remand order sent. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM, and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., on 2/19/10, ORDERING that dfts' motions to dismiss 6 and 19 are GRANTED. Pltf's first, ninth, twelfth, and thirteenth claims are dismissed without leave to amend. As to all other claims, pltf is GRANTED 15 days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint. Dfts are GRANTED 30 days from the date of service of pltf's second amended complaint to file a response thereto.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 15 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 10/29/2009. Attorney Stevan J. Henrioulle added as attorney of record for Plaintiff Dmitriy Lanin. (Krueger, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
