National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Truoung, et al.,
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation |
| Hung Anh Truong, Vacaville Furniture Gallery, Inc. and Anthony Edward Aguas |
| 2:2009cv02469 |
| September 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| William B. Shubb |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
JUDGMENT dated *9/8/10* in favor of plaintiff against defendants pursuant to order signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/7/10. Plaintiff is awarded $1,297,376.71 in damages and prejudgment interest against defendants, jointly and severally. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
30
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/23/10 RECOMMENDING that pltf's 25 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment be granted, and that pltf be awarded $1,297,376.71 in damages and prejudgment interest against defts, jointly and severally. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/26/10 ORDERING that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is continued to 4/19/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. Joint Status Report due by 4/5/10. (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
