Olivas v. Davey et al
Plaintiff: Pedro Joaquin Olivas
Defendant: D. Davey, E. Sandoval and M. Townsend
Case Number: 2:2009cv02498
Filed: September 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/23/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 23 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and this action is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
April 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/28/2010 ORDERING that the 14 findings and recommendations filed on April 6, 2010 are vacated.(Duong, D)
April 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/06/10 ORDERING the clerk of the court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
February 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/12/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 8 application to proceed IFP is GRANTED; pltf to pay the $350.00 filing fee w/ an initial filing fee of $1.72 in accordance w/ the concurrent CDC order; pltf 's 7 motion for extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary; service is appropriate for dfts D. Davey, E. Sandoval, M. Townsend; the clerk to send pltf forms for service to be completed and returned w/in 30 days along w/ Notice of Submission. (Yin, K)
September 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/11/09 ORDERING that pltf's 2 motion to proceed IFP is DENIED w/out prejudice; pltf to submit, w/in 30 days a properly completed ifp application that includes the certified copy of the trust acct statement and a prison official's certification; the clerk to send pltf an ifp application. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olivas v. Davey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pedro Joaquin Olivas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Davey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Sandoval
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Townsend
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?