Coxey v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Pattie A. Coxey
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2009cv02530
Filed: September 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/14/2013 DENYING 36 Motion to Amend the Judgment. (Michel, G)
December 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/5/2011 re 38 ORDERING that plaintiff's time is EXTENDED to 12/12/11 to file a reply. (Duong, D)
September 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/29/11 ORDERING that plf's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; the Commissioner's 28 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
May 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/24/10 ORDERING that this action is reassigned to the Magistrate Judge; all documents hereafter filed shall be denominated as CIV S-09-2530 EFB. (Becknal, R)
May 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/11/10, ORDERING that the Court's 8 Order to Show Cause is hereby DISCHARGED. (Kastilahn, A)
April 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/29/2010 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, on or before May 12, 2010, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to follow court orders and/or for failure t o effect service of process within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Failure of plaintiff to timely comply with this order may result in sanctions, including a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to follow court orders, for failure to effect service of process within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m),and/or for lack of prosecution. (Duong, D)
December 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/15/2009 ORDERING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is deemed withdrawn; and 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are vacated as moot. (Matson, R)
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/19/09 ORDERING that the Clerk randomly assign a USDJ to this case. Case has been randomly assigned to U.S. District Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. It is RECOMMEN DED that pltf's IFP application be denied, and pltf be given 30 days within which to pay the filing fee of $350.00. Motion to Proceed IFP 2 referred to Judge Burrell. Within ten days after being served with these f&r's, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties.(Kastilahn, A)
September 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/14/09: Plaintiff is directed to file, within ten days of this order, a further affidavit containing information regarding her husband's income and whether she is supported by that income, and an accounting of her monthly expenses. The court will then resume consideration of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coxey v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pattie A. Coxey
Represented By: Frederick H Lundblade, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?