Battershell, et al., v. SMUD et al
| Anson Battershell and Marcia Battershell |
| Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Clifton Lewis, John DiStasio, Ednan Hamzawi, Michael Wirsch and Arlen Orchard |
| 2:2009cv02533 |
| September 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 05/20/10 ORDERING extention of time for Defendants to file a Motion for Award of Attorneys Fees and Bill of Costs from May 25, 2010 to June 25, 2010. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time for defendants to file a motion for attorneys' fees and bill of costs from 5/18/2010 to 5/25/2010 signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/14/2010. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/4/10 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION to DIMISS 7 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice, and this action is CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER 13 signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/21/2010 ORDERING 7 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Hearing CONTINUTED to 2/22/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
