Wright v. Hamlet

Petitioner: Gordon James Wright
Respondent: J Hamlet
Case Number: 2:2009cv02543
Filed: September 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2012 Filing 65 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 6/29/12 ORDERING that Petitioner's Request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; IT IS RECOMMENDED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus 14 be DENIED; These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. Distruct Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to these F&R due within twenty-one days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 28, 2011 Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/28/11 ORDERING that petitioner's 41 , 42 motions are DENIED as moot. (Kastilahn, A)
September 26, 2011 Filing 43 ORDER adopting 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/26/11: Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition addressing the remaining, properly exhausted claims within 60 days from the date of this order. Petitioner is directed to file a reply within 30 days after service of an answer. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. (Kaminski, H)
February 24, 2011 Filing 39 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/23/11 recommending that respondent's 06/14/10 motion to dismiss 29 be granted in part; The following claims and any included sub-claims be dismissed as unexhausted cla ims 1,2,4,8,10,11 and 13. Respondent be directed to file a response to petitionr's habeas petition addressing the remaining, properly exhausted claims identified above within 60 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. Petitioner be directed to file a reply, if any, within 30 days after service of an answer. MOTION to DISMISS 29 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
March 26, 2010 Filing 26 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/25/10. (Plummer, M)
March 1, 2010 Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/01/10 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Amended Petition and accompanying materials (Docket No. 14, 17-18) and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell, Attorney General) (Plummer, M) Modified on 3/1/2010 (Plummer, M). Modified on 3/2/2010 (Plummer, M).
October 27, 2009 Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/09 ORDERING that petitioner's 5 application to proceed IFP is GRANTED; petitioner's 2 motion for a stay and abeyance is DENIED w/out prejudice; petitioner has 30 days to file a renewed motion for stay and abeyance addressing the issues refrenced in this order; and petitioner's 9 motion for a court order is DENIED as moot. (Yin, K)
September 16, 2009 Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/16/09 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Hamlet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gordon James Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J Hamlet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?