Cole v. People of the State of California
| Jeffrey Mark Cole |
| People of the State of California |
| 2:2009cv02549 |
| September 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 1/9/12 RECOMMENDING that Claims remaining in 24 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jeffrey Mark Cole be denied. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Due to the appointment of Recalled Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer to the bench of the Eastern District, this action is REASSIGNED from Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd to Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer for all further proceedings. The District Judge currently assigned to the case will remain unchanged. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/14/11 ordering within 60 days from the date of this order respondent shall file an answer to the first and third claims of petitioner's second amended petition. Petitioner's reply, if any shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of the answer. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/25/11 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 36 are adopted in full; Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely 26 is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Respondent's motion to dismiss petitioner's second and fourth claims as time-barred is granted; and Respondent's motion to dismiss petitioner's first and third claims as time-barred is denied. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/17/11 ORDERING respondent's 06/24/10 request to substitute Warden Anthony Hedgpeth as respondent in this action 26 is granted. The clerk of the court is dir ected to amend the docket to reflect that Warden Anthony Hedgpeth is the respondent in this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely be granted in part and denied in part as follows: Respondent 9;s 06/24/10 motion to dismiss petitioner's second and fourth claims as time-barred 26 be granted; and respondent's 06/24/10 motion to dismiss petitioner's first and third claims as time-barred 26 be denied. MOTION to DISMISS 26 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 33 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/04/10. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/9/2010 ORDERING that, w/in 30 days, ptnr to file an opposisiton to respondent's 26 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/28/10 ORDERING that Respondent's 1/26/10 MOTION TO DISMISS 16 is DENIED as moot. Respondent is directed to file a response to Petitioner's 4/23/10 second Amended habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/2010 ORDERING that the court's 3/10/2010 order to show cause is DISCHARGED; w/in 30 days, petitioner to either file a request to amend his petition w/ a proposed amended petition, or file an opposisition to respondent's motion to dismiss; the clerk to send petitioner a hc petition form. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/09 DIRECTING respondent to file a response to the 10/15/09 amended petition w/in 60 days; reply due w/in 30 days of answer; if response is a motion, opposition or statement of non-opposition due w/in 30 days of motion, reply due w/in 15 days thereafter; the clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the 10/15/09 amended petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell)(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cole v. People of the State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jeffrey Mark Cole | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: People of the State of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
