Locklear v. Schwiner et al
| Clifford Locklear |
| Schwiner, V. Singh, S.W. Brown, K. Picco, J.W. Halviland, Solozano, Clax, Orrick, Tan, Dusay and Williams |
| 2:2009cv02594 |
| September 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| John F. Moulds |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/28/2012 DENYING 44 Motion for Reconsideration of the 42 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations construed as a Motion for Relief from Judgment. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
40
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 06/06/11 recommending that defendants' 11/18/10 motion for summary judgment be granted; and judgment be entered in this action in accordance with any order of the district court adopting these findings and recommendations and the 10/20/10 order of the district court dismissing defendant Clay. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 37 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/19/2010 ORDERING 34 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; Defendant Clay's 19 Motion to Dismiss is granted; and defendant Clay is dismissed from this action. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 9/14/10 ORDERING that Clerk is directed to assign this action to a United States District Judge; recommending that 19 MOTION to DISMISS be granted; and Defendant Clay be dismissed from this action. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/15/2010 ORDERING that, w/in 30 days, pltf to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the 19 motion to dismiss; failure to comply will result in a recommendation that dft Clay be dismissed from this action pursuant to F.R. Civ. P. 41(b).(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
20
DISCOVERY and SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 03/29/10 ordering Discovery due by 6/18/2010. Dispositive Motions filed by 9/10/2010. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/16/10 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of the 15 letter to Amy Whelan, Esq., Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/1/10 DENYING 13 Motion to Appoint Counsel.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/23/09 DIRECTING USM to serve Complaint filed on 9/16/09, on Solozano, Clay, Orrick within 10 days. Clerk of the Court is directed to forward the instructions for service ofprocess, the completed summons, copies of the complaint, a consent/reassignment form for each defendant and copies of this order to the United States Marshal. Clerk of the Court shall serve upon plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of Court. (cc USM)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Clifford Locklear signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/13/09; CDC to collect monthly payments from pltfs account until filing fee is paid in full. (CC: CDC and financial) (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
