Garrett v. Smoking Everywhere, Inc.
| Bryn Garrett |
| Smoking Everywhere, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv02651 |
| September 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| John F. Moulds |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 03/24/11 GRANTING continuance of Class Certification Briefing Schedule; Plaintiff shall file a motion for class certification which is timely noticed for hearing on July 25, 2011,commencing at 9:00 a.m. Alternatively, Plaintiff shall explain in a filing noticed for hearing at the same time and date, why this action should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution. Motion Hearing set for 7/25/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.(Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 10/19/10, ORDERING pltf to file a motion for class certification, which is timely noticed for hearing on or before 5/16/11, or pltf shall explain in a filing noticed for hearing no later than 5/16/11, why this action should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution. A further status hearing is SET for 9/19/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. A joint status report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to the status hearing. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/12/2010 ORDERING that since the status of these cases is unclear, another status conference is scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on October 18, 2010. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status hearing.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
8
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/8/10 ORDERING that Action 09-cv-3434 FCD JFM is REASSIGNED to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds for all further proceedings. All Further proceedings, and a ll dates currently set in this REASSIGNED case are VACATED. The Caption on documents filed in the REASSIGNED case shall show the initial "GEB" instead of "FCD". Further Status Conference is scheduled in No. 09-3434 GEB JFM on Fridays 2/1/2010 at 09:00 AM. A joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to the Status Conference. The Clerk shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garrett v. Smoking Everywhere, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bryn Garrett | |
| Represented By: | Tonna K. Farrar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Smoking Everywhere, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
