Digital Software Services, Inc. v. Entertainment Programs, Inc. et al
| Digital Software Services, Inc. |
| Entertainment Programs, Inc., Joseph A. Pershes, Koch Entertainment Distribution, LLC, Ingram Entertainment, Inc., CD Video Manufacturing, Inc. and L&M Optical Disc West, LLC |
| 2:2009cv02763 |
| October 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Butte |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| Plaintiff |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/6/2014. Plaintiff's 101 Request to confirm Partial Final Award against EPI is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 101 Request to lift stay of proceedings as to defendants EPI, Pershes and Koch/Entert ainment One is GRANTED. However, plaintiff's 101 Request to lift stay of proceedings as to defendants Sky Media LLC; C.D. Video Manufacturing, Inc.; Ingram Entertainment, Inc.; and L & M Optical Disc West, LLC is DENIED. Plaintiff's 101 Request that Court issue an Order requiring defendants EPI, Pershes, and Koch/Entertainment One to produce documents is DENIED. Plaintiff's 101 Request that Koch/Entertainment One's name be amended is GRANTED. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/11, ORDERING that the 7/6/11 status conference is VACATED. Counsel are to file an updated joint status report BY 7/20/11 to include the arbitration schedule and the date arbitration is expec ted to be completed. Counsel are to file updated joint status reports every 60 days thereafter regarding the status of arbitration. Counsel shall notify the court immediately once the arbitration is completed. The stipulation for continuing status conference and permitting telephonic appearances 75 is DENIED as moot. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
68
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/26/2010 ORDERING Dfts' Petition to Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 32) is GRANTED. Given that order to arbitrate, Dfts' concurrently filed Motion to Stay Proceedings P ending Arbitration (Docket No. 32) is also GRANTED. Finally, Dft Ingram Entertainment's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 27), as well as the Motion to Dismiss brought on behalf of Sky Media, LLC dba Historic Sales (Docket No. 44) are DENIED as moot given the Court's decision to stay this action in its entirety pending arbitration between Plaintiff and EPI.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/25/2010. Defendants' 32 Petition to Compel Arbitration is GRANTED. Given that Order to arbitrate, defendants' concurrently filed 32 Motion to Stay proceedings pending Arbitration is also GRANTED. Finally, defendant Ingram Entertainment's 27 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot since this action is STAYED in its entirety pending arbitration between plaintiff and EPI. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
42
STIPULATION and ORDER 38 signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/23/09 ORDERING Dft and Cross-Dft Entertainment Programs, Inc.'s time to respondto Dft and Cross-Claimant C.D. Video Manufacturing, Inc.'s cross-claim is extended until 10 days after this Court issues a ruling on the pending petition to compel arbitration and motion to stay the proceedings.(Engbretson, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
