Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| John Jackson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2009cv02801 |
| October 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/25/2011 ORDERING Plaintiff's 23 motion for summary judgment is DENIED; Defendant's 25 cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in defendant's favor. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER 22 signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/3/10, ORDERING that pltf's time to file the summary judgment in this case is hereby EXT from 7/27/10 to 7/29/10. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/28/10 ORDERING that the Plaintiff's time to file the summary judgment in this case is hereby extended from 6/25/10, to 7/27/10. This extension is required due to Plaintiff& #039;s counsel's impacted briefing schedule. plaintiff is advised that given the length of time since defendant's answer and the administrative transcript were filed, the court is not inclined to grant plaintiff any further extensions in this case absent a showing of substantial cause. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/27/2010 GRANTING 17 Stipulation and Proposed Order; Plaintiff's time to file the summary judgment is extended from 4/26/2010 to 6/25/2010. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/9/09 ORDERING that plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in Social Security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within fifteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal an original and five copies of the co mpleted summons, five copies of the complaint, five copies of the scheduling order and a completed USM-285 form, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. (cc USM) (Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Bess M. Brewer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
