United States of America v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
| United States of America |
| Pacific Gas and Electric Company |
| 2:2009cv02877 |
| October 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Plaintiff |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3545 Action to Recovery Money |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 11/28/11 ORDERING that, pursuant to 35 Notice of Settlement, a dispositional document shall be filed by 02/21/12. The 05/14/12 pretrial conference shall remain on calendar, in the event no dispositional document is filed, or if this action is not otherwise dismissed. A joint pretrial statement shall be filed 7 days prior to the final pretrial conference. (Benson, A.) Modified on 11/29/2011 (Benson, A.).
|
|
Filing
30
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 05/09/11 ORDERING that, per 29 Notice of Related Case, cases 2:09-cv-2877 GEB EFB and 2:10-cv-02806 LKK GGH are deemed RELATED; 2:10-cv-02806 is reassigned to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings; a further Status Conference is SET for 09/19/11 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. with a joint status report due 10 days prior. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
28
PROTECTIVE ORDER re: 27 Stipulated Protective Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/12/11. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 03/14/11. ORDERING that the following dates are EXTENDED: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 06/20/11; Rebuttal Expert Disclosures due by 07/20/11 and Discovery due by 08/20/11. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER RELATING, CONSOLIDATING AND SCHEDULING ACTIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/28/2010 ORDERING that case nos. 2:09-cv-02877-GEB-EFB and 2:10-cv-01875-WBS-DAD are RELATED. Action 2:10-cv-01875-WBS-DAD is reassigned to the judges as signed the earlier filed action, and any dates currently set in the reassigned case are VACATED. The consolidation request is GRANTED; these two actions are CONSOLIDATED for all purposes. Case 2:10-cv-01875 shallbe administratively CLOSED, and Case 2:09-cv-02877-GEB-EFB is hereby designated the "MASTER FILE." The 2/10/2010 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order governs the consolidated action with modifications. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Ernest Robert Wright |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pacific Gas and Electric Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
