Romero, et al., v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Jorge M. Romero and Lucia Orozco |
Indymac Federal Bank, Citimortgage, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., Security Mortgage Funding Corp. and Huong Lo |
2:2009cv02889 |
October 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Morrison C. England |
None |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/9/10 ORDERING that this matter is REMANDED to Sacramento County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/8/10 ORDERING FDIC's Motion to Substitute as Receiver for Indymac 35 is GRANTED; The Clerk is directed to substitute "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Indymac Federal Bank, FSB" for named dft Indymac Federal Bank. (Carlos, K) |
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/26/10: The Court dismisses Defendants OneWest Bank, FSB and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. in its capacity as nominee/beneficiary of Plaintiffs' One West-administered Deed of Trust. The suit brought against these Defendants is REMANDED to Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento. The Clerk is directed to terminate the Defendants. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.