Chissie v. Winco Foods, LLC et al
Leslie Ann Chissie |
Winco Foods, LLC and Joel Clark |
2:2009cv02915 |
October 20, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sutter |
Morrison C. England |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/19/19 ORDERING the Court received the Notices of Related Cases filed on 4/4/19. The Court has determined, however, that it is inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. This Order is issued for informational purposes only and shall have no effect on the status of the cases, including any previous Related (or Non-Related) Case Order of this Court. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 109 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/17/2018 ORDERING that the Court DECLINES to issue an order relating the cases. Defendant'srequest is DENIED without prejudice. (Washington, S) |
Filing 91 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 2/13/12 ORDERING that Defendants' 54 , 55 Motions forSummary Judgment are GRANTED on grounds that Plaintiff's state law claims against Defendants are preempted by the LMRA . Plaintiff is permitted to file an amended complaint stating claims under the LMRA, should she choose to do so. Any such amended complaint must be filed not later than 20 days following the date of this Memorandum and Order. If no amended pleading has been filed at the conclusion of said 20 day period, the Court will enter judgment in favor of Defendants without further notice. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 90 ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/17/11 ORDERING that the following dates are CONTINUED: Bench Trial set for 02/11/13 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. with trial briefs due 11/ 29/12; Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/13/12 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. with a joint pretrial statement due by 11/21/12; any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by11/21/12; Oppositions mu st be filed by 11/29/12 and any reply must be filed by 12/06/12. The motions will be heard by the Court at the same time as the Final Pretrial Conference. All other due dates set forth in the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order are confirmed. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 83 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 08/22/11 ORDERING plf is GRANTED an additional 10 pages on her opposition to each of the dfts' Motions for Summary Judgment. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 40 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/29/2011 GRANTING defendants' 38 Ex Parte Application to modify Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order and to compel independent medical examination. Plaintiff Leslie Ann Chissie is ORDERED to submit an independent medication examination relating to her mental condition. The Examination will take place by 8/4/2011. Defendants allowed until 8/11/2011 to file their Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures. All Deposition of any and all Expert Witnesses shall be completed by 8/19/2011. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/11/10 ORDERING the plaintiff's motion to remand 9 is DENIED. (Becknal, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.