Serrano v. California Correctional Deparment of Correction et al
Plaintiff: Amador Serrano
Defendant: California Correctional Deparment of Correction and California Correctional Center
Case Number: 2:2009cv02927
Filed: October 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Imperial
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/27/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed and that all pending motions be denied as moot. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
July 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/22/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 21 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED and pltf's 20 request to proceed IFP is DENINED as unnecessary. (Yin, K)
May 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/06/10 ordering plaintiff's complaint 1 is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time 14 and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 15 are denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
February 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/10/10 ORDERING pltf to SHOW CAUSE in writing, w/in 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to resolve fees.(Yin, K)
November 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/18/09 ordering plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the clerk of the court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)
October 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/28/09 ORDERING pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, a complete ifp application w/ required certified trust acct statement, or the appropriate filing fee; and the clerk to send pltf a new ifp application. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Serrano v. California Correctional Deparment of Correction et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amador Serrano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Correctional Deparment of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?