Holston v. Debanca et al
Plaintiff: Theron Kenneth Holston
Defendant: Joseph Debanca and Phillip L. Spandini
Case Number: 2:2009cv02954
Filed: October 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Yuba
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/5/2012 DISMISSING CASE, with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(1) re 82 Stipulation and Proposed Order; DENYING, as moot, 71 Motion for late submission of supplement; DENYING, as moot, 75 Motion for Continuance re 73 Motion for Reconsideration; DENYING, as moot, 81 Motion to Dismiss. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
May 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/9/2012 ORDERING that the defendants' 78 request for 120 days to file dispositive documents is GRANTED; within 120 days, defendants shall file either dispositive documents or a status report; and the court's 3/12/12, scheduling order is VACATED. (Yin, K)
April 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/2012 AFFIRMING 70 Order of the magistrate judge. (Michel, G)
March 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/09/12 ordering plaintiff's motion to compel further production of documents from defendants 48 is denied. Defendants' motion to compel plaintiff's further deposition 51 is grant ed; Defendants' request for sanctions 51 is denied; and plaintiff's motion to strike portions of defendants' reply 56 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to compel further production of documents and responses to requests for admis sions from defendants 55 is denied; plaintiff's motion for leave to submit an addendum and declaration 64 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for a pretrial conference via video conferencing 59 is denied. Relating to the final motion, discovery in this case is extended to 05/25/12 and the parties may file dispositive motions on or before August 31, 2012.(Plummer, M)
May 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/05/11 granting 43 Motion for Extension of time. Plaintiff shall respond to defendant Spadini's discovery requests on or before 06/09/11. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 43 is denied. (Plummer, M)
March 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/10/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 2/11/11, are adopted in full; Defendants' 5/28/10 motion to dismiss 21 is denied; and Defendants are directed to file an answer within thirty days. (Becknal, R)
March 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER denying 37 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/07/11. (Plummer, M)
February 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/10/11 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket to reflect the correct spelling of defendants names, Joseph DeBranca and Phillip L. Spadini; a nd Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. It is RECOMMENDED that 21 MOTION to DISMISS be denied; and defendants be directed to file an answer within 30 days. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
April 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/23/10 DENYING 18 Motion for judicial notice without prejudice. (Dillon, M)
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/02/10 DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms. Service is appropriate for Joseph Debanca, Phillip L. Spandini. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 2 USM-285 Forms, and 1 copies of the Amended Complaint filed on 02/25/10 to be completed and returned within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
February 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Theron Kenneth Holston signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/12/2010. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee of $14.16 and thereafter the $335.84 balance and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holston v. Debanca et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theron Kenneth Holston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Debanca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillip L. Spandini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?