Beem v Craig et al
Plaintiff: W. L. Beem
Defendant: Craig and Miller
Case Number: 2:2009cv02991
Filed: October 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/5/11 ORDERING that 27 request for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED; this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; 26 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as mootl and the Clerk is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
February 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/10/11 denying 24 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The deadline for service of plaintiff's responses to defendants' outstanding discovery requests is extended to 03/04/11. (Plummer, M)
January 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/14/2011 ORDERING that dfts' 18 motion to compel discovery is GRANTED; pltf's 18 motion for sanctions is DENIED w/out prejudice; pltf shall, on or before 2/18/2011, serve his responses to ea dfts' discovery requests, w/out objection; the discovery deadline is EXTENDED to 6/30/2011; the dispositive (pretrial) motion deadline is EXTENDED to 9/15/2011. (Yin, K)
December 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/15/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall, within 21 days after service of this order, show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on him for failure to file an opposition to defenda nts motion to compel discovery filed November 11, 2010, and shall file such opposition or statement of nonopposition; Defendants may, within 14 days after service of plaintiffs opposition, file a reply; and if plaintiff has already provided the requested discovery, defendants shall so inform the court within 7 days after the filing date of this order.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beem v Craig et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: W. L. Beem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?