Dailey v. Martel, et al,
James Edward Dailey |
Michael Martel, William Knipp, Richard Laituri, Rosanne Campbell, Silvia H. Garcia, Michael D Bunnell, W. Desvoignes, M. Knowles, S. Kernan and R. J. Robinson |
2:2009cv03024 |
October 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/22/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2/23/11 MOTION for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(b) 11 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 8 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/13/2010 ORDERING the clerk to randomly assign a US Distric Judge; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due w/in 21 days.(Yin, K) |
Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of James Edward Dailey signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/4/2010. CDC is to collect monthly payments and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.