Davis et al v. Wells Frago Bank, N.A. et al
| David L Davis and Karen A Davis |
| NDEX West LLC, MortgageIT, Inc., Deutsche Bank, HSBC Bank USA and Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. |
| 2:2009cv03028 |
| October 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| None |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/22/10 ORDERING dfts' motion to dismiss 47 is GRANTED and pltfs' claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/29/2010 GRANTING Defendants' motions to dismiss. Wells Fargo and NDEX's motion to dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice 18 , 24 . Plaintiffs' claim for rescission under TILA is also DISMISSED without leave to amend. However, as to pltfs' TILA damages claim, pltfs are granted 15 days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint in accordance with this order. Dfts are GRANTED 30 days from the date of service of pltfs' second amended complaint to file a response thereto. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/8/2010 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' request for a nuc pro tune extension of time 27 is GRANTED. The reply briefs may be filed March 15, 2010. (Krueger, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
