Santos v. Cate et al
Timothy Marvin Santos |
Mathew Cate and Domingo Uribe, Jr. |
2:2009cv03143 |
November 16, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Imperial |
Edmund F. Brennan |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 6/28/11, RECOMMENDING that the application for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. Matter referred to Judge Mueller. Within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within seven days after service of the objections. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Due to the appointment of Recalled Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino to the bench of the Eastern District, this action is REASSIGNED from Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan to Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino for all further proceedings. The District Judge currently assigned to the case will remain unchanged. (Donati, J) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/4/10 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.