Willaims v. Sullivan et al
Anthony Willaims |
- Sullivan, G DeMatteo and J. Bal |
2:2009cv03160 |
November 16, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/9/2013 ORDERING the custodian to produce Anthony Williams, #T-23796, to testify in USDC at 9:00 AM on 8/19/2013 in courtroom #25, before Magist rate Judge Kendall J. Newman; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and the clerk to serve a copy of this order and writ on the Out-to-Court Desk and Warden of CSP-LAC. (cc: OTCD-SAC) (Yin, K) |
Filing 94 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/21/13 denying Motions to Appoint Counsel 86 , 87 . (Plummer, M) |
Filing 85 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/23/2013 DISCHARGING the 80 show cause order; defendant's pretrial statement is deemed timely filed.(Yin, K) |
Filing 80 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/07/13 ordering that within 7 days of the date of this order, defendant shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failing to file a timely pretrial statement; within that time, defendant shall file his pretrial statement. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 77 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/4/13 ORDERING that plaintiffs motion for extension of time 75 is GRANTED; plaintiffs pretrial statement is due within thirty days of the date of this order; defendants pretrial statement is due fourteen days thereafter; Defendants motion to dismiss 74 is DENIED.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 73 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/1/13 ORDERING that defendants January 25, 2013 motion to dismiss (dkt. no. 69 ) is DENIED; Plaintiffs January 28, 2013 motion (dkt. no. 70 ) is construed as plaintiffspretrial statement; D efendants February 22, 2013 motion to dismiss (dkt. no. 72 ) is DENIED; Plaintiff shall file an amended pretrial statement within 21 days from the date of this order; defendant shall file his pretrial statement 14 days thereafter; The pretrial conference, to be conducted on the file only, without appearance by either party, is continued to April 22, 2013; and the April 8, 2013 jury trial date is continued to June 3, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom #25.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 63 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/27/12 ORDERING that defendant Sullivans summary judgment motion 50 is denied as to plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim based on defendants alleged failure to provide medical care after plaintiff allegedly informed him that he was ill; defendants summary judgment motion is granted in all other respects. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 58 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/18/12 ordering plaintiff is hereby informed of the following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. (see order for further details). Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion is due within 45 days of the date of this order. No further requests for extension of time to file an opposition will be granted. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 55 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/30/12 ordering that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/11 granting 45 Motion to modify the scheduling order. Within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall serve defendant with responses to the at-issue interrogatories. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a copy of his complaint filed 11/13/09 1 . (Plummer, M) |
Filing 42 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/03/11 plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 39 is denied. Within 5 days of the date of this order, defendant shall serve plaintiff with the ten at-issue interrogatories and file p roof of service with the court within 21 days, plaintiff shall serve defendants with his responses to the interrogatories; all objections have been waived. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 40 is denied. Defendant's motion t o modify the scheduling order 41 is granted. Defendant may file a motion to compel regarding plaintiff's responses to the at-issue interrogatories on or before 12/14/11; discovery is otherwise closed. The pretrial motion cut-off date is re-set for 04/20/12. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/30/11 granting 36 Motion to Compel. Within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall serve defendant with responses to interrogatories 1-10 without any objection. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 37 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/1/2011 ORDERING that within 21 days from the date of this order, pltf shall show cause for his failure to file his opposition; within that time pltf shall also file his opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to compel; failure to respond to this order will be deemed a waiver of opposition. (Reader, L) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/23/11 ORDERING that Defendant Mejia is DISMISSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/19/11 ORDERING that within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why defendant Mejia should not be dismissed. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/9/10 ORDERING that the claims against defendants Demetteo and Bal are dismissed. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/1/2010 ORDERING that ptlf's 12 motion for clarification is RESOLVED. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.