Johnson v. Dickenson
| Clifford Johnson |
| Kathleen L. Dickenson |
| 2:2009cv03167 |
| November 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/2/11 RECOMMENDING that Respondents 27 motion to dismiss for failure to state a cognizable federal habeas claim be denied; Petitioners 28 motion for leave to dismiss and refile the petition be granted to the following extent: The second amended petition 25 is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. If petitioner files objections, he shall also address if a certificate of appealability should issue and, if so, as to which issues. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/01/11 ordering respondent is directed to file a response to the claim described above within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/12/2011 ORDERING that respondent's 11 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; ptnr's 1 petition is DISMISSED; ptnr's 19 amended petition is DISMISSED; the clerk is to send ptnr a habeas corpus form; ptnr has 21 days to submit a second amended petition; all outstanding motions are DENIED; and respondent need take no further action unless directed to do so by the court. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/01/10. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/27/2010 ORDERING respondent to indicate w/in 14 days whether she has any opposition to ptnr's 15 request being granted. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/27/10 ORDERING that Petitioner's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2 is GRANTED; Petitioner's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel 3 is DENIED; Respondent is directed to file a response to Petitioner's habeas Petition within sixty days from the date of this order. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order, the consent/reassignment form comtemplated by Appendix A (k) to the Local Rules of this Court, and a copy of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus on Michal Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Dickenson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Clifford Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kathleen L. Dickenson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
