Villasenor v. City of Fairfield
Plaintiff: Hugo Villasenor
Defendant: City of Fairfield and Fairfield Police Department
Case Number: 2:2009cv03182
Filed: November 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/29/2018 ORDERING that Mr. Phavasiri's request on behalf of Mr. Villasenor is DENIED as procedurally and substantively improper, and the court DECLINES to sign the enclosed I-918 Suppleme nt B. The Clerk of Court shall file the 8/23/2018 letter and enclosed documents on the docket in this action, along with this order. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on Mr. Phavasiri at the address provided in the letter. No further filings will be entertained in this long-closed case. (Zignago, K.)
August 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/8/2011 ORDERING that the Clerk SEAL all documents accompanying Pltf's 54 motion, as the documents appear to contain Pltf's personal data identifiers and private health information. (Zignago, K.)
March 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER and FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/30/2011 ORDERING that the hearing on the defendant's 36 Motion To Dismiss, Or, In The Alternative, Motion To Compel Disclosures And Discovery Responses And An Appearance At Deposition; and 38 Request For Sanctions, presently scheduled for April 14, 2011, is VACATED. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's case be dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court close this case and vacate all future dates in this case. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Duong, D)
March 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/8/2011 ORDERING that the hearing on Dft's 36 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 4/14/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Pltf shall file an op position to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition, by 3/17/2011. If Pltf files an opposition, he shall also address why he should not be sanctioned for having previously failed to file a timely opposition to the motion. Dft may file a reply by 3/24/2011. (Zignago, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Villasenor v. City of Fairfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hugo Villasenor
Represented By: Robert S Arns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Fairfield
Represented By: Kimberly M Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fairfield Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?