Misagro v. City of Citrus Heights

Misagro v. City of Citrus Heights

Plaintiff:	Misagro
Defendant:	City of Citrus Heights
Case Number:	2:2009cv03215
Filed:	November 18, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge:	Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 1, 2011	Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/28/2011 ORDERING 22 that the time for the parties to exchange initial expert disclosure EXTENDED to 4/13/2011; and the time for the parties to exchange any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure is EXTENCED to 5/12/2011. (Reader, L)
December 20, 2010	Filing 21 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/17/2010 GRANTING 20 Stipulation and Proposed Order; The time for the parties to exchange initial expert disclosure requirements pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(i) is e xtended from January 17, 2011 to March 13, 2011; and the time for the parties to exchange any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii) is extended from February 16, 2011 to April 12, 2011. (Matson, R)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 1, 2011

Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/28/2011 ORDERING 22 that the time for the parties to exchange initial expert disclosure EXTENDED to 4/13/2011; and the time for the parties to exchange any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure is EXTENCED to 5/12/2011. (Reader, L)

December 20, 2010

Filing 21 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/17/2010 GRANTING 20 Stipulation and Proposed Order; The time for the parties to exchange initial expert disclosure requirements pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(i) is e xtended from January 17, 2011 to March 13, 2011; and the time for the parties to exchange any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii) is extended from February 16, 2011 to April 12, 2011. (Matson, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Misagro v. City of Citrus Heights
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Misagro
Represented By:	Clyde DeWitt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of Citrus Heights
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?