Johnson v. GCR Enterprises, LLC et al
| Scott N. Johnson |
| GCR Enterprises, LLC and Henry Carrillo |
| 2:2009cv03287 |
| November 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Scott Johnson against Henry Carrillo signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/13/2010. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 08/30/10 ORDERING 18 MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT deemed withdrawn. Findings and Recommendations are referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 4/23/10, ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONT'D from 4/26/2010 to 10/18/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. A status report shall be filed 14 days prior to the status conference in which pltf is only required to explain the status of the default judgment. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER 7 for Extension of Time signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/25/2010. Defendant GCR Enterprises dba Rubino's Italian American Cuisine shall have until 3/26/2010 to respond to Complaint. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
