Greater Stockton Chamber of Commerce, et al v. Kelso, et al
| Greater Stockton Chamber of Commerce, County of San Joaquin and City of Stockton |
| J. Clark Kelso and California Prison Healthcare Receivership Corp |
| 2:2009cv03308 |
| November 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John F. Moulds |
| William B. Shubb |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER re DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/3/10. Civil Case Terminated. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/20/10. The Court grants a further 45 day extension of time to provide sufficient time for the parties to execute the settlement agreement and file the appropriate court filings to fully resolve this matter. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/27/10: All litigation deadlines are continued by thirty (30) days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/2/10 DENYING petitioners' 14 Motion to Remand; petitioners objections to the administrative record and proposed litigation schedule due within 30 days; respondents response and proposed schedule due 10 days thereafter. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/2/10 ORDERING that Respondents shall file the administrative record no later than 3/1/10. The courtesy copy delivered to chambers may be an electronic copy rather than apaper copy; A schedule for briefing on the merits and for finalization of the administrative record will be entered after the hearing set for 3/22/10; The parties have stipulated that in the event that the court retains jurisdiction over the petition, state procedures, in so far as they do not conflict with federal procedure, will govern resolution of the petition. The parties shall be prepared to inform the court of these procedures, and to propose a schedule, at the 3/22 hearing. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/26/2010 ORDERING that petitioners are granted 30 days to provide briefing and evidence as specified; respondents are granted 15 days thereafter to file response; petitioners reply due 7 days thereafter; hearing set for 10:00 AM on 3/22/2010. (Suttles, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
