Jauregui v. Weiner et al
| Jorge Robles Jauregui |
| Jerry W. Weiner, Doctor's Hospital of Manteca, A. Traquina, Rallos, Hsieh, Roher, Basi and Collinswhort |
| 2:2009cv03329 |
| December 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/2/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 9 motion to hold this action in abeyance is DENIED as defective; pltf's 10 motion to be evaluated by an outside physician i s DENIED; and the clerk to randomly assign this action to a District Judge; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice due to pltf's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Assigned and Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jorge Robles Jauregui signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/7/09. The director of CDCR shall collect and forward monthly payments to the court. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and a copy of Pltf's IFP on CDCR and serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc: CDCR and CFS) (Engbretson, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
