Solis v. H & M Roofing, Inc. et al
Hilda L. Solis |
H & M Roofing, Inc., Tod Marston, Brian Ellis and Tom Horan |
2:2009cv03340 |
December 1, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
John A. Mendez |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
None |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 CONSENT JUDGMENT signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/5/10 ORDERING JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED, pursuant to Section 16(c) of the Act, in favor of the Secretary and against Defendants H&M Roofing, Inc., Tod Marston and Tom Horan in the total amount of $60,000; and this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for purposes of enforcing compliance with the terms of this Consent Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 76 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/19/2010 ACCORDINGLY 68 clarification on plaintiffs request, regarding the court's order 66 on discovery motions. (Reader, L) |
Filing 66 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/15/2010 ORDERING The motion 55 for sanctions and to compel attendance at depositions is GRANTED in PART; dfts Marston and Horan shall appear w/i 30 days for their depositions in EDCA, Sacra mento, CA, with any documents responsive to the deposition subpoenas to be issued, at a time to be noticed by pltf with 8 days notice; Counsel may contact CRD Matt Caspar to schedule a room for the depositions. No later than 10/15/2010, pltf shall su bmit a letter brief; No later than 10/20/2010, dfts may file a responsive brief. The motions 52 , 54 to compel is GRANTED in PART; dfts' general objections are OVERRULLED. No later than 10/29/2010, dfts shall, without objection, produce all d ocuments responsive to requests for production of documents, nos. 4-6, 8-13, 15-19, 21, 48-50. No later than 10/29/2010, dfts shall, without objection, provide further responses to interrogatories nos. 6, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21. All dfts also shall p rovide verifications by 10/29; no later than 10/29/2010, dfts shall provide an unqualified admission or denial to requests for admission nos. 1 and 2 after a diligent search of documents sufficient to answer the requests. Requests for admission nos. 3 and 43 are deemed ADMITTED. (Reader, L) |
Filing 47 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/16/10: Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion for Protective Order is granted. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 31 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 08/30/10 GRANTING 25 Motion to Shorten Time. Motion to Stay Discovery Hearing set for 9/15/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Williams, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.