Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: John Johnson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2009cv03395
Filed: December 7, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/6/12 GRANTING 29 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is AWARDED $5,016.69, to be paid to plaintiff in care of his counsel, who shall give proper consideration to the Treasury Offset Program discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), in effectuating any assignment of the fee award. (Meuleman, A)
March 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM, OPINION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/29/2011 ORDERING that Pltf's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Commissioner's 26 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED for further proceedings. The Clerk to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
January 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/4/11: Defendant shall have a SECOND extension of time of 14 days, up to and including January 12, 2010, to respond to 20 Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. (Kaminski, H)
December 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/13/10: Defendant shall have a FIRST extension of time of 35 days, up to and including December 29, 2010, to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. (Kaminski, H)
September 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/2/10. The Plaintiff's time to file the summary judgment is hereby extended from August 31, 2010, to October 8, 2010. (Kaminski, H)
June 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION and ORDER 15 for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/15/2010. Plaintiff's time to file Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 8/31/2010. (Marciel, M)
December 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/14/09 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk is directed to serve scheduling order and serve a copy of this order on the USM. Within 15 days Pltf shall submit service docs to the USM and file a statement with the court that said docs have been submitted. (cc: USM) (Engbretson, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Johnson
Represented By: Bess M. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?