Douglas v. Martel, et al
Bryan Anthony Douglas |
Sultanian, M. Martel and Heatley |
2:2009cv03411 |
December 8, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/30/11 ORDERING that Plaintiffs 25 motion to extend discovery is MOOT; Defendants 28 motion to conduct plaintiffs deposition via video-conference is MOOT; It is RECOMMENDED that 30 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT be granted; and judgment be entered in favor of defendants Soltanian-Zadeh and Heatley and this case closed; motion referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 21 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/2/2010 ORDERING that the first amended cmplt is DISMISSED w/out prejudice; the 18 motion to appoint counsel is DENIED ; the 19 motion for the court to screen the first amended cmplt is DENIED as moot; dfts Sultanian and Heatley have 14 days to file a responsive pleading. (Yin, K) |
Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/03/10. Service is appropriate for Soltanian and Heatley. Clerk to send plaintiff: 2 USM-285 forms, 1 summons and instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed on 12/08/09. Submission of documents due within 30 days. IFP 2 Motion is GRANTED ; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the $350.00 filing fee in accourdance with the concurrent order. The 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (Williams, D) Modified on 5/3/2010 (Williams, D). Modified on 5/3/2010 (Williams, D). Modified on 5/3/2010 (Williams, D). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.