Douglas v. Stevens
| Bryan Anthony Douglas |
| B. Stevens |
| 2:2009cv03412 |
| December 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER disregarding 49 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/19/11. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
43
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/10/11 recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment filed on 02/24/11 37 be granted. Motion for Summary Judgment 37 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/29/11 ORDERING that defendant is directed to re-serve the reply at plaintiffs most current address at Mule Creek State Prison. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/24/11 ORDERING that Plaintiffs 29 motion for extension of time to conduct discovery is denied; Plaintiffs 30 motion for leave to amend his complaint is denied; and the deadlines set forth in the Discovery and Scheduling Order (docket # 20) remain in effect. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/22/10 ORDERING that 22 Motion to Compel is DENIED; Plaintiff is granted an extension of time of 28 days from the date of this order to serve a response to defendants request for admissions apparently served on him on or around 8/3/10. Plaintiffs inapposite opposition to a motion for summary judgment 27 which motion has not been filed to date, is disregarded.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/25/10 DIRECTING USM to serve * complaint * filed on * 12/08/09,* on * B. Stevens*. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/22/09 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect an initial partial filing fee of $1.06 and thereafter, forward payment from the prison trust account of Bryan Anthony Douglas to the clerk until the balance of $348.94 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Douglas v. Stevens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bryan Anthony Douglas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: B. Stevens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
