Escarsega v. City of Stockton et al
| Henry Escarsega |
| City of Stockton, Stockton Police Department, Fritts, McCutcheon and Huff |
| 2:2009cv03466 |
| December 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| John F. Moulds |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/7/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 11 request for relief from this court's 3/29/10 order is DENIED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Henry Escarsega signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 03/29/10. The Sheriff of San Joaquin County is collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of San Joaquin County. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/22/09 DISMISSING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP without prejudice; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
