Avent v. Cate et al
Plaintiff: Rufus A. Avent
Defendant: M Cate and L. Lesane
Case Number: 2:2009cv03482
Filed: December 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/14/11 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Rufus A. Avent at 10:00 am on February 9, 2012 in Courtroom 27 before Judge Dale A. Drozd. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD)(Dillon, M)
August 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/15/11 ORDERING 27 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; 21 Motion for Summary Judgment by defendant Lesane is denied. (Matson, R)
June 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/16/11 RECOMMENDING that 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by L. Lesane be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/23/10 ORDERING that dft's 14 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; dft L. Leslane shall file a responsive pleading to plf's complaint w/i 30 days. (Benson, A.)
March 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/25/10 DIRECTING USM to serve * complaint * filed on * 12/16/09,* on * L. Lesane*. (Plummer, M)
February 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/19/10 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect an initial partial filing fee of $1.00 and thereafter, forward payment from the prison trust account of Rufus A. Ave nt to the clerk until the balance of $349.00 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Avent v. Cate et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rufus A. Avent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. Lesane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?